Testing the boat in different water conditions
|
|
Building and motors |
|
Lesson plan #4-5 |
|
ABOUT THE LESSON |
|
|
Topic |
Testing the boat in different water conditions |
|
Duration |
90 min |
|
Goal(s) of the lesson |
Students test their boat prototypes in real-world water conditions, analyze performance, and propose improvements based on test results. |
|
The big idea behind the topic |
Boats must operate under varying conditions – still vs. flowing water, waves, obstacles, and direction changes. Real-world testing provides feedback on motor strength, stability, manoeuvrability, and control. These lessons simulate real navigation challenges and help students think like engineers. The aim is to get an idea of how the built prototype behaves in the water, what are its characteristics, how well it handles control etc. |
|
Results of the lesson |
|
|
Competencies |
Work methods, testing |
|
Methods |
Brainstorming, discussion, practical experiments |
|
Connection with other modules |
Testing can be done after electronics are added to the prototype. At this stage of the autonomous boat project, it is crucial to have at least preliminary versions of all the devices and components that will be used on the boat. Only with these elements in place can the boat be effectively tested on water. This is because the boat's characteristics, such as stability, manoeuvrability, and overall behavior on water, can significantly change depending on the equipment installed. Each component, whether it is the control system, sensors, data collection mechanisms, or additional modules, contributes to the overall weight, balance, and dynamics of the boat. Overlooking these factors can lead to inaccurate testing results and, consequently, incorrect conclusions about the boat's functionality and efficiency. Therefore, integrating and testing all proposed components in real-world conditions is a key aspect of the development process. This will not only accurately determine how each element affects the boat's behavior but also identify potential problems and shortcomings that can be addressed before the final assembly and launch of the boat. |
|
Relevance to the curriculum |
Technology, engineering, physics |
|
Stakeholder involvement |
Pool, outside facilities, seaside, lake, river etc |
|
EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NEEDED |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
STEP-BY-STEP ACTIVITIES |
|
|
Introduction |
Overview of the session. Explain that different water conditions require different strategies (e.g., river vs. lake). Why do we test? |
|
Brainstorming |
In groups, students list types of water bodies and discuss expected challenges (waves, currents, obstacles). Use the “Compare Water Environments” worksheet. |
|
Testing and experiments |
Discussion on the importance of applying theoretical knowledge to practical situations, particularly in engineering and design. Here’s an example playlist about Physics of docking. You can see some bits of it with students. Real-world testing of theories regarding the length and shape of prototype parts, identification of current and structural problems and searching for solutions, possibly resolving on-site, otherwise recording a report for later repair. Practical tasks in groups:
Document results and take notes |
|
Reflection & Reports |
Group discussion:
|
|
Assessment |
|
|
Annexes |
Sailtunities_Lesson 4-5_Presentation_EN Annex 1. Worksheet for boat testing (see below) Annex 2. Compare Water Environments |
|
Annex 1. Worksheet for boat testing
Annex 2. Compare Water Environments Task: With your team, compare how different water environments might affect a boat’s movement, control, and stability. Fill in the table and answer the questions below. PART 1: Water Environment Comparison Table
Check the level of difficulty, list challenges, and brainstorm how to overcome them. PART 2: Discussion Questions
Erasmus+ KA2 Cooperation Partnerships project Sailing Into Opportunities No. 2023-1-LT01-KA220-SCH-000161306 sailtunities.gaminu.eu |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the national Agency. Neither the European Union nor the National Agency can be held responsible for them. |


